Continuing my series on the five keys to great B2B creative, we next need to discuss ways to find the very best creative talent.
Today, let’s explore this critical challenge from an agency perspective.
Despite all the dramatic changes in marketing over the last decade, ours is still a business of big ideas. It’s just that the formula of “Big Idea = Advertisement” is no longer remotely accurate.
Big ideas today, rooted in deep buyer insights, differentiate by finding ways to give buyers highly relevant, helpful information where, when and how THEY want it. No longer are we able to merely push out messages through mass channels and reach our goals.
So truly big marketing ideas are now more often than not the collective product of an expanded team of marketers across many disciplines, from media to marketing technology to public relations to social media and on and on.
However, despite the recent spate of grumbling about the continued use of the word “creatives” to describe the copywriters and art directors in our business,# ultimately, an art director and writer have to make it all work in the execution.
Because nothing kills a big idea faster than poor execution, finding great creatives still maters. It matters more than ever.
To today’s B2B creative directors, I share the following advice:
Look for a proven ability to handle complex sales
The talent pool of experienced B2B creatives is not infinite. So to bring in fresh talent, you will likely need to consider creatives who lack previous experience in B2B.
The problem, as any experienced B2B creative director knows, is that success in B2C far too often does not translate into our business.
In B2B, a cleaver headline or borrowed interest will not get it done by itself. Many talented creatives from the consumer side cannot apply their skills in B2B.
The very best B2B creative comes from teams with the ability to balance rationale and emotional appeals. Pure emotional plays that are part and parcel to B2C marketing, be they humorous or dramatic, rarely make the phone ring.
One of the reasons for this is that B2B creative must address complex buy cycles that take place over time. We’re not selling cereal. There are serious consequences to making the wrong decision: professional consequences and personal ones.
So if you are looking at creatives who have no B2B experience, at least look for those who have sold a complicated product: pharmaceuticals, high-end electronics, financial services, any product or service where the buyer is making a considered decision.
Look for a proven ability to meet the demands of content marketing.
As we’ve discussed, marketing today requires not only the continued generation of big ideas but finding ways to translate these ideas into content that meets prospects’ information needs where, when and how they want.
Executing on content ideas requires additional skills beyond just visuals and headlines.
For copywriters, it requires the ability to act as a reporter, to gather information via research and personal interviews, to break down complex topics into digestible chunks, to develop compelling narratives.
For art directors, it requires the ability to tell stories visually, to develop infographics that explain complex ideas in elegant ways, to create layouts that ease skimming online and in print, to translate stories into Web video and Flash presentations.
Typically, creatives do not have this kind of work in their portfolios. So in my experience, you need to work harder to identify creatives who will be able to deliver.
Look for creatives with some journalism in their backgrounds, ask for long copy/layout samples (even if it is just a college term paper or blog), create test content marketing assignments, you get the picture.
Also, endeavor to spend a LOT of time in interviews probing to see how inquisitive the prospective hire is, how he or she thinks and processes information, where he or she has run with projects in the past without a lot of hand holding.
Look for a proven ability to work with digital technologists
It is a rare copywriter or art director that does not have digital work in their book. But to my mind, that’s table stakes.
What I really want to see is how well creatives can collaborate with colleagues on the digital side of the agency.
When reviewing digital work, ask specific questions about HOW they worked with the information architects, programmers and DBAs, what was the process like, who did what and when? If the creatives seemed to have always worked in a vacuum, no matter how strong their work, I’d pass.
You want to identify creatives who not only understand the technology end but also embrace working with tech folks from the very beginning and know how to do that.
By that, I mean that the processes and culture on the digital side are very different than the traditional writer/art director “hole up in a room and toss ideas around” world.
Thinking back on my own path, I remember the first time I invited a programmer to a concepting session, in the interest of being “inclusive,” and watched her sit passively because the entire notion was so foreign.
I quickly learned that for the most part, my colleagues on the digital side need more structure (something creatives reject out of hand) and often are much more comfortable working independently and then sharing their work frequently along the way. To them, this IS collaboration and it works well in their environment. So I adapted.
The moral of the story is that not every creative has the people skills to bridge this cultural divide. And if your creatives can’t or won’t adapt, all your digital work will suffer for it. Thus, you better be sure your creative can make nice.
Now, a lot has also been written about the need to hire “digital natives.”
I think in B2B, this is overstated. I would not discriminate against a Gen-Y creative, but the reality is, in B2B, Gen-X managers are the ones grabbing the reins from Baby Boomers and so they’ll be making decisions for a while. Therefore, creatives who have comfort and active participation in social media are just fine.
In my next post, I’ll take on this question from the perspective of B2B clients evaluating agencies on their creative potential.
# Yes, I understand and acknowledge the larger point that the process of generating big ideas frequently involves strategists, programmers, public relations practitioners, media buyers, etc. But after the big, collaborative “Ah Ha” moment, after all the back slapping, inevitably a copywriter and art director are summoned to bring that rough notion to life: what exactly do we say? How exactly does it work? What exactly does the user experience? On and on, every detail sweated over and dissected. The execution of big ideas makes or breaks the idea. And when that execution happens, probably during a bunch of late nights, the other members of the aforementioned team are nowhere near the room. So yeah, agencies need to collaborate on big ideas. But the idea that we’ll rename the creative function in some kind of Kumbaya gesture to make everyone else feel that their ideas are appreciated is beyond ridiculous.To channel Jack Nicholson in “A Few Good Men,” I ask:
“Have you ever stared at a blank notepad or screen while in possession of nothing more than a half-baked creative brief, an insane deadline and a case of Diet Coke? If you have not and believe you should also be called a ‘creative,’ I say pick up a pen or grab your laptop and stay late with us. Otherwise, I’d just ask for a simple thank you as you walk out to grab the 5:15 home.”
